Today's most viewed
| MUSIC |  | | | Add your own event to our listings page Click here | | Tracing your family roots.
A page dedicated for those wanting to trace their family roots. Contacting relatives from across the world can be easy. Why not join our forum? Click here |
|
|
|
Diver boat owner speaks out
The owner of a dive boat involved in a near miss with a Royal Navy in Falmouth Bay said despite frantic flag waving he thought he was going to be run over.
Sean Beadie, who runs the Cousin Jack, regular takes divers out into the bay on Friday evenings. Last Friday he claims he was nearly run-over by the HMS Enterprise survey vessel and has now reported the incident to the Marine Accident Investigation Board.
"We regularly dive over what is known as the Cannonball site. It is known for giving up the odd cannon ball and divers also collect scallops," he said.
"We take trips into the bay and dive every Friday night. Last Friday we were there and had our flags flying as usual. There was no problem. The Enterprise came out of Falmouth and was some distance from us," he said.
Divers from the Cousin Jack had gone over into the water but the next thing Mr Beadie and his crew realised was the HMS Enterprise was within half a mile of them.
"He was heading straight towards us," he said.
He immediately tried to get hold of the bridge of the vessel via VHF but without success. " I could not get hold of him at all. I called the coastguards. They had been listening and they had visual on us. They know us well. The ship was bearing down and was soon 100 feet away from the side of me. I had a person waving a warning flag at him frantically from the stern. He was doing about four knots. If he had not altered course he would have hit us."
Mr Beadie still had two divers in the water on the seabed at the time. He claimed the naval vessel had gone right over them. On surfacing they asked what had been going on.
It appeared the only way to contact the Enterprise was via a satellite phone, said Mr Beaddie.
Back in port Mr Beadie sought out the commanding officer from the Royal Navy vessel only to be told that the ship had a VHF hand held which was not working properly.
Coastguards at Falmouth confirmed an incident had happened and that an investigation was under way. The Royal Navy has denied there was a problem and said the ship altered course well in time. For further story click here
12:39pm Wednesday 21st May 2008
Print 
Email this 
CommentPosted by: subakwa, Nr Truro on 8:17pm Wed 21 May 08
As one of the divers who was in the water at the time, I have to say that I was enormously disappointed by the actions of the ship's commander both at the time, and that of the Navy since, if the comments attributed to them in the linked story are true.
There were 10 divers, our skipper and a crewman on the rear deck of Cousin Jack who heard the commander admit he had not heard the radio contact efforts due to a fault with his VHF and yet that is now being denied.
To then indicate that we should not have been in water where it is perfectly admissable to dive and we do so regularly is frankly laughable.
This ship was apparently drawing over 5m of water that day and divers were due to be doing stops at 5m just around this time. It is not stretching the truth to say that we were lucky that someone was not seriously injured or killed. An incident in Dover a couple of years ago where a tugboat ran over a diver who was at a similar depth caused broken bones and cuts - imagine the damage a 90m naval vessel and its props would do. This situation would almost certainly have been avoided by the radio contact being returned.
As one of the divers who was in the water at the time, I have to say that I was enormously disappointed by the actions of the ship's commander both at the time, and that of the Navy since, if the comments attributed to them in the linked story are true.
There were 10 divers, our skipper and a crewman on the rear deck of Cousin Jack who heard the commander admit he had not heard the radio contact efforts due to a fault with his VHF and yet that is now being denied.
To then indicate that we should not have been in water where it is perfectly admissable to dive and we do so regularly is frankly laughable.
This ship was apparently drawing over 5m of water that day and divers were due to be doing stops at 5m just around this time. It is not stretching the truth to say that we were lucky that someone was not seriously injured or killed. An incident in Dover a couple of years ago where a tugboat ran over a diver who was at a similar depth caused broken bones and cuts - imagine the damage a 90m naval vessel and its props would do. This situation would almost certainly have been avoided by the radio contact being returned.
Posted by: Neil, Falmouth on 11:09am Thu 22 May 08
I was on the boat (CJ) throughout the whole time this was going on - RN are being idiots. They screwed up, so they should just admit it.
Luckily no-one got hurt, and I can hardly see th point of this being in the local rag!
I was on the boat (CJ) throughout the whole time this was going on - RN are being idiots. They screwed up, so they should just admit it.
Luckily no-one got hurt, and I can hardly see th point of this being in the local rag!
Posted by: Neil, Falmouth on 11:10am Thu 22 May 08
I was on the boat (CJ) throughout the whole time this was going on - RN are being idiots. They screwed up, so they should just admit it.
Luckily no-one got hurt, and I can hardly see the point of this being in the local rag!
I was on the boat (CJ) throughout the whole time this was going on - RN are being idiots. They screwed up, so they should just admit it.
Luckily no-one got hurt, and I can hardly see the point of this being in the local rag!
Posted by: adam west, thailand on 2:24pm Thu 22 May 08
"cannonball site" its illegal to pick up scallops without a licence,maybe this should be looked into.
"cannonball site" its illegal to pick up scallops without a licence,maybe this should be looked into.
Posted by: Birt, Cornwall on 9:08pm Thu 22 May 08
[quote][bold]adam west[/bold] wrote:
\"cannonball site\" its illegal to pick up scallops without a licence,maybe this should be looked into.[/quote] What leads you to say that? I certainly do not understand this to be correct.
adam west wrote:
\"cannonball site\" its illegal to pick up scallops without a licence,maybe this should be looked into.
What leads you to say that? I certainly do not understand this to be correct.
Posted by: get a life, falmouth on 6:52pm Fri 23 May 08
westie sort it out cornish man or no
westie sort it out cornish man or no
What are these links for?
If you liked this article and would like to share it with others on the web who might be searching for good content we've made it easy for you to do it.
At the bottom of all articles, you'll see links to six sites. These sites - commonly called 'social bookmark' or 'social news' sites - have large communities of web users who share and rate interesting, useful and fun things on the web.
Clicking the links will automatically add the address of the story you are reading to one of these sites, letting you share it with others. Each site will ask you to register to share stories. Registration is free and once a member, you can store, recommend and search for stories that interest you.
More on Digg
More on del.icio.us
More on Furl
More on reddit
More on NowPublic/
More on Yahoo!
